Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 2, 2024

NASDAQ US Health Care Pharmaceuticals conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Welcome to the UBS Virtual Event. Ashwani Verma, you may begin.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#2

Great. Thanks for that. Hi, everybody. Welcome to UBS Virtual Ophthalmology Day. My name is Ash Verma, I cover SMID-cap biotech and spec pharma here at UBS. And our next company session is Tarsus Pharmaceuticals. With me today, I'm really excited to host Aziz Mottiwala, who is the Chief Commercial Officer at Tarsus. Hey, Aziz.

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#3

Ash, thanks so much for having us. I'm really delighted to be here and share a little update on how things are going for us.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#4

Excellent. Thanks. And just as a reminder for the audience that are listening in, if you have any questions that you want me to ask, feel free to e-mail me or ping them to me on Bloomberg, and we can bring that into the conversation.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#5

Maybe, Aziz, I guess, like it might be helpful just if you can give like a brief overview of the company for the benefit of the audience, and we can get started from there.

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#6

Certainly. Thank you. So Tarsus, we are a commercial stage company that recently launched about a year ago, the first-ever approved product for Demodex blepharitis. This is a disease that affects over 25 million Americans. It's essentially inflammation, irritation of the eyelids that's caused by a microscopic organism called the Demodex mite. So this is our first area of launch. A year in, the launch is going exceptionally well. And I'd say, the way you can think about Tarsus is a commercial stage company with great launch momentum, a lot more to come and then a budding pipeline that we're really excited about. And I'll tell you a little bit about the launch, and then I'll touch briefly on the pipeline. And then certainly, I'm sure you had some questions. So I think the launch so far has been a real surprise for a lot of folks, but one that's even exceeded our expectations, I would say. As of the second quarter, we have delivered nearly 100,000 bottles to patients. So we treated almost 100,000 patients, and that's remarkable. But what's really exciting is that we're really just scratching the surface. There's so many patients. We focus on about 7 million patients out of the 25 million that are in the clinic. And treating 100,000 of those patients is great, but we have a lot more to do there and a lot more opportunity to be had. Secondly, I think the other highlight of the launch has been categorized by really great progress in reimbursement. And this was shown with our better-than-expected gross-to-net discount of 44% in the second quarter, really underscores the value. We're netting over $1,000 a bottle for XDEMVY, and I think that's been a great value driver. And I think that's something that folks are starting to appreciate how impactful this product is and the value it provides with each prescription. And then the third really exciting thing is just the physician receptivity. The physician receptivity has been remarkable. We talk to about 15,000 doctors on a routine basis. And as of the second quarter, we hit over 11,000 of them prescribed, meaning we've got to about 3/4 of our core audience in less than a year. And that is also very exciting and bodes well for the future trajectory of the launch, as these doctors now become more routine writers and deepen their prescribing habits. When you look at the totality of that effort, that yielded us about $40 million in revenue in the second quarter. And of course, we're excited about where we're going to be taking things forward. And as we look forward on the launch, there's really a few things that we think about in terms of building and maintaining this momentum. One is continued education of the physician and just building that deepening of prescribing with the doctors. For that, we've actually increased the sales force size by about 50%. We started at launch with about 100 sales reps, and we're now fully deployed with 150 reps that are out there. And they are seeing these doctors more frequently, which is driving increased prescribing per doctor. Secondly, we see a great opportunity with continuing to build out great reimbursement. The 44% discount was really based on establishing great commercial coverage. But we also announced that we got at least one Part D payer on board. And as we expect to see the rest of the Part D payers come in, in 2025, we expect stability and improvements on that 44% discount, and that will maintain throughout in the low 40s at steady state. And then the third exciting thing we see here is the opportunity to really engage the consumer. We see this as a consumer-driven disease, one where patients will be very motivated to seek treatment. And to that end, we are launching a direct-to-consumer campaign in the fourth quarter. So I think what you're seeing is a great launch so far and many more levers to pull in terms of sales force, reimbursement and consumer activation that will continue to accelerate this launch. And we're really excited about that. And the other part I mentioned is the pipeline, right? We've got a pipeline that's essentially a pipeline and a molecule of lotilaner. And we expect updates across the pipeline programs in prevention of Lyme, in rosacea and also in meibomian gland disease, which is essentially a great extension into the eye. So lots going on, lots of great opportunities to increase the value of the company as we progress the quarter, but the launch trajectory is obviously the primary focus. And as I mentioned, we've got a lot of great things coming there. And then the pipeline, I think, is going to provide some great updates for folks as we progress.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#7

Excellent. Thanks for starting us off on a strong footing here. So I think maybe just like talking about the market a little bit just so that people understand like Demodex blepharitis, I think you said that like the core -- like the 7 million out of the 25 million prevalence. And just if you can like go through the numbers in terms of like what do you think is the eventual addressable market? I remember like from back when we used to interact when I covered the stock, I think there was a lot of focus on just like driving like diagnosis expansion. And you used to talk about like dry eye disease as a positive analog. Like where are we in that type journey? Where do you think eventually you might -- like what portion of the market may you eventually be able to tap into?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#8

Correct. Yes. So as we mentioned, there's about 25 million Americans that suffer from the disease. We focus on 7 million is the core audience, as you mentioned, Ash, and that's really comprised of a few different segments. One is you've got 1.5 million patients that are already diagnosed in the clinic. These patients have been historically diagnosed. There was no good solution for these patients and now they have one. And we think that, that's sort of the lowest hanging fruit, right, patients that are suffering have been identified and haven't had a good solution until XDEMVY. So that's an opportunity for us to continue to expand, as we mentioned, only treated a fraction of patients so far. The other segments, as you alluded to, include the areas where you have a high overlap or high propensity to have the disease, areas like dry eye where we see 60% of patients who are on a dry medication and actually have either Demodex blepharitis or concomitant disease. So either they were misdiagnosed or they have concomitant disease. And you can imagine that's a great intervention point. These patients come in, they typically fail a medication. That would be a great opportunity for the doctor to assess the eyelids and see if there's an opportunity to treat the root cause of the blepharitis if that's what the core issue is. Similarly, we see an opportunity in cataract surgery, where over half the patients presenting for cataract surgery have Demodex blepharitis. And as we talk to ophthalmologists, there's a desire to optimize the eye prior to surgery, where you want to eliminate the inflammation, irritation, all these things that can confound and provide complications for the surgical outcomes. And we think that's a great opportunity. We're hearing doctors apply XDEMVY as part of their pre-cataract screening and then, of course, the routine prep before the patient hits the OR. And then in optometry, which is another core audience for us, contact lens discomfort is a major issue. And a large proportion of these contact lens intolerant patients are actually intolerant due to blepharitis. So we think that these are core segments that are easy to identify. And to your point, now that we have XDEMVY, we'd expect the diagnosis rates to increase within the core audience of just core blepharitis. But also as a secondary diagnosis that patients are presenting with either dry eye showing up in cataract surgery or contact lens discomfort, these are core areas that the doctor can identify, diagnose and then subsequently treat patients. And we are making great progress across all of these. I think the typical journey as a doctor starts, they usually start with those routine blepharitis patients. Once they see about 5 to 10 cases and they get some good confidence and success because the product doesn't disappoint, it's very consistent in terms of great outcomes, then they start to look at other segments in the office, right? They say, okay, let me look at my dry-eye patients or let me put this into my cataract routine. And we see that natural progression as we visit the doctor more and more often and as they build experience with the product.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#9

Yes. Do you think that the -- like the patients segmentation that you have in terms of like where the severity of the patients is, is that where most of the use is happening right now? Do you think that you could start to tap into more like a moderate or less severe patients eventually also?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#10

Yes. We're seeing utilization across the board, Ash. I think as you would expect, the doctors typically start with the very obvious cases, right, heavy collarettes, patients actively complaining. And because the drug works so well and because the results have been so positive for the patients and the physicians, as I mentioned, they get about 5 to 10 cases and then they start opening up the utilization. So the doctor says, okay, I'm going to start looking for this more proactively. I'm going to start thinking about any and all patients coming in the door that have collarettes. So their threshold to treat quickly comes down as they get experienced. And that really underpins why we decided to expand the sales force because the more often we can get to the doctors, we can reinforce the great outcomes they're having and then sort of remind them to think about this for a broader set of patients. And we see that pretty instinctively, as we make more routine sales calls, as these doctors get to conferences, hear from other colleagues, that experience -- that surround sound as well as their personal experience really propagates broadening of use and depth of prescribing in their practice.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#11

Great. Okay. So I think like in terms of the launch, just as you look forward, like what do you think are the major drivers? You called out like this Medicare coverage that's like you got one payer on board and looking for more of an expansion in 2025. Just if you can elaborate on that? Like is that something that you think that can drive like a substantial ramp in 2025? Like what's the sort of the volume pull-through? What kind of impact on pricing just from that book of business?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#12

Yes. No, it's a great point. So the way to think about this is our market is roughly 45% commercial, 45% Medicare. The remainder is your other government channels. So both commercial and Medicare are equally as important to us. 2024 was really about establishing commercial coverage. And we've done a great job. We're pretty much where we want to be. A couple of other plans we'd like to get into the fold, but we've got the vast majority of commercial lives where we'd like them to be. Part D was something we planned on having in 2025, very fortunate that we had one major plan put us on early. I think that speaks to the -- just the value of the product and the experience we're having and just the great work our payer team has done. And we are confident with our estimate of having the rest of the Part D payers on in 2025. And I think what that will allow us to do is certainly enhance the patient and physician experience. The PAs become more consistent, the prior authorizations that is. The experience becomes a little bit more easy. It opens the door for more patients. So it certainly opens up easier access for these patients. And then I think in terms of pricing or discounts, that will allow us to maintain a stable discount. And what we said is at steady state through 2025, by the midyear point, we should be in the low 40s. So some modest improvement from where we are today, which was actually better than we even expected to be, but a steady and consistent gross-to-net in the low 40s once Part D completely kicks in. And then I think that will also allow us to drive additional volumes of patients as that patient and physician experience becomes more consistent and even easier.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#13

Yes. So I guess like if I think about like the commercial and the Medicare like roughly being the same lives, and you said that one of the largest Medicare plans has signed up, have you put any numbers around it? Like how much that might mean? I'm trying to figure out like how many additional -- like if we are looking at like 30%, I'm just making up a number, of the 50% becoming available, so is that the upside? And so you signed this recently? And like is that any kind of like a tailwind to 2024 numbers or more likely volume coming in '25?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#14

Yes. So I do think that the plan that we signed, we did announce that in Q2, that's now taken into effect. So we should see some impact of that in 2024. I think that's another subtle driver here, opening the door to at least one of those large Part D payers. We do see some coverage in other Part D payers as well. Typically, that's through prior authorization, medical necessity or exception. So there are patients that are coming through. So I don't think about 2025 as a step-up. I think about it as a steady progression that will continue to open the door. And we haven't gotten specific in terms of lives, et cetera. We've really just focused on the quality of the coverage and the critical mass we're building, right? So I'd say at this stage, we've got the vast majority of commercial coverage that we want to get. One of the large Part D payers and to put it in perspective, there's really 3 big Part D players and then a handful of others. But if you get the big 3, if you will, you've got pretty much great Part D coverage. So we've got one of those big players, and I'm really delighted that, that was actually done without even a prior authorization. So high-quality Part D coverage for that first payer. We'll see where the other ones net out, but we do expect them to kick in, in early 2025. And then just keep in mind, right, when you get into Q1, there's always some headwinds, right, deductible resets, plan resets. So as you work through that, you start to see the appreciation. So what we said is you'll start to see that meaningfully pull-through as we progress through 2025, and I expect just a steady cadence of volume appreciation on the back of that increased coverage.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#15

Got it. Okay. So you are already at like a 44% gross-to-net. And like even with almost like as many lives being added on the Medicare side, you still think that like low 40s is like a good steady state. I mean that's -- like how -- like is that because like the reception in the Medicare channel has worked out to be far better than you were originally expecting? I know typically, like you can see more gross-to-net type discounting in the Medicare channel. I'm just curious what's driving that confidence in the low 40s?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#16

Yes. And to be clear, I think what you'd expect to see, we're at 44% in the second quarter. You may see some fluctuations in either direction in the range of a couple of points, either up or down, depending on just how things shake out through the end of the year, things like the donut hole, plan resets, et cetera, and then sort of settling in that low 40s as we get into steady state in 2025. What gives us confidence is, I think, just the quality of negotiations we've had with the payers. You alluded to this. I think for folks since it is the eye care day, right, people may think about anterior segment drugs where you've seen gross-to-net discounts upwards of 60%, 70%. So to be at a 44% discount is really remarkable. And I think that that's a testament to the work we did very early on, educating the payers and that we're continuing to do with the payers. And what I think really underpins this is, one, an appreciation that the fact that there's nothing for this disease today, right? There's no generics. There's no real over-the-counter market here. This is our really first and only and best-in-class treatment for these patients. I think when the payers look at that, they look at the quality of the product in terms of very high outcomes, over 85% of patients get a meaningful clinical outcome here. The durability, it's one treatment, essentially gets the patient resolved for 6 to 12 months, which is really remarkable. And I think the payers see that this is a very high value and impactful product. So that's really helped us in those negotiations. And I think you're right, it's very different because there's not competitors, there's not extrinsic forces pushing on us. It's really a discussion with the payer about the value of the market, the value of the product, and we've been able to do quite well in these negotiations. And I think the last thing is the product has performed in the real world, right? So the Part D payers now have seen a year of performance of this product. And certainly, they're tracking, does this product really deliver? And what they're hearing very consistently is the product works very well. It works as promised. Physicians are having a good experience. Physicians are willing to do the prior authorizations and push for the medication. So there's a pent-up demand, if you will, that the payers are seeing, which also helps in that process.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#17

Yes. All right. Great. So I wanted to ask around -- any kind of like just a retreatment opportunity here? And how often do you expect patients to refill? So that's one part of the question. And then secondly, I think the IQVIA data is slightly under capturing the demand of the product. So to the extent that you can like help us understand like what's sort of the dispense variability versus where IQVIA data is? And if you have any sense on like could that change?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#18

Sure. Yes. So let's talk about retreatments first, right? So when we look at the clinical data in our pivotal studies, we track cohort of patients out for 12 months. And what we saw is about 40% of the patients recur by month 12. So we would expect to have some meaningful retreatments as we continue to progress in the launch. I think you'd expect to get some proportion of that 40% on an annual basis. I think what we said is a conservative estimate is could you see a 20% tailwind at steady state where these patients are getting retreated on a routine basis. And think about it, the patient would recur, they have to make an appointment, they have to see the doctor. They have to have a certain threshold of disease to get retreated. So while we see in clinical studies a 40% retreatment, I think it's still early to say what the real-world impact is going to be, but I would certainly estimate that we're going to get some good proportion of those patients on an annual basis coming back in. I think in transitioning to IQVIA question, I think what's to be determined is how is that patient volume tracked because the time lag between the initial treatment and maybe a retreatment may be so long that IQVIA wouldn't record it as a retreatment, it may be recorded as an NRx again. So we see this as a tailwind on prescriptions overall as patients start coming in. And I think you'll start to see that more meaningfully in 2025 as we've got critical mass of patients and longer time out in the marketplace. You'll start to see those retreatments start to be a tailwind for us certainly. I think to your question around IQVIA, that's always a hot question. I think the way to think about this is, directionally, it's pretty good. The trend is very consistent. With IQVIA, it's been relatively stable. But in any given week, it can be up or down. It can fluctuate from what the actual numbers we see are. And we try to reconcile that for everyone every quarter. We report our actual dispense numbers every quarter, and people can reconcile that versus the IQVIA number. So what I tell everybody about IQVIA is just take a step back. Instead of looking at it a weekly because the weekly will fluctuate, look at this over several weeks, months, quarters, and those numbers are relatively consistent. The trend is consistent, but the actual number may vary. And I can't predict how they're going to project that on a weekly basis. I wish I could, but they have their own algorithm. We provide them all the dispense data. We're not holding anything back. We've been pretty open about the data set, but IQVIA has their own process, and they project the data the way they do. So yes, so hard to say what that sort of factor would be on a weekly or quarterly basis. But what we've done traditionally, say, at the end of every quarter, we'll reconcile that for everyone. And in the interim, I'd say, look at this on a longer-term basis instead of just on a week-to-week because the week-to-week projection is going to fluctuate.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#19

Yes. Okay. All right. Great. So let's talk about like the DTC a little bit. So just help me understand, so like -- so this is something that you're planning to initiate in 4Q, you said, right? Like what's the amount of investment that you're making? And typically, like I guess, when is like the benefit that you start to see from this type of a DTC campaign? Any thoughts on that? And yes, I guess it's like a mix of like social media, TV advertisement or just where is most of the focus at?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#20

Yes, that's a great question. So very early on in the commercial planning for XDEMVY, we knew that the consumer activation would be a great part of the strategy here. It was just a matter of timing. And why now? I think now because we've established pretty close to where we're going to be in terms of gross-to-net. So we're getting a high-value prescription. Two, we've also penetrated a large proportion of the market. So we have a lot of doctors utilizing the product. So between the reimbursement and the physician base being established, we thought it was a great time to start to drive the patients into this space. What we see here is an investment that would bridge Q4 and Q1 of about $10 million to $15 million. And we'd start this effort on connected TV, which is our streaming platforms, Amazon Prime, Hulu, Tubi, Peacock, et cetera, these online channels where you can be very targeted and direct with and hitting the right patients. We will complement that with online, digital and social media. So you will have a surround sound effort. I think we'd start to see some impact as early as Q4. You'd typically start to see impacts pretty quickly. I think that impact tends to ramp over time, right? So you're not going to see the full impact right away. You'll start to see some impact in the fourth quarter, and then we'd expect that to continue in the first quarter. And certainly, we're seeing a great result with the effort we put forth. We think about expanding that effort then more broadly to network TV and really enhancing that investment over time. And again, that would be driven on seeing the right ROI and the right impact. But we're very bullish on this. All the research we've done tells us that patients are very receptive to the advertising and that they're very motivated when they understand -- because this is a disease you can see and feel, right? They feel uncomfortable. They feel the discomfort. They can see the redness and crusting. So they're very receptive to understanding about the disease because they're suffering. And then when they hear that it's a mite, you can imagine, they're pretty motivated to get the problem fixed, and they want to see their doctor right away. So we're really bullish on this opportunity. We think that the patients are going to respond very well to the advertising. And we've got a very hard-hitting, action-oriented campaign that we're set to debut here in the coming weeks.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#21

Yes. Okay. All right. So maybe just like switching gears to the pipeline a little bit. So for the like MGD, like what percentage of MGD patients have Demodex infection? And how these patients are currently being identified right now and treated? And how can that change?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#22

Yes. Meibomian gland disease is a really exciting area for us. Just to remind folks, the studies we've done is with the exact same formulation of XDEMVY. So it's the same drop, same bottle. The Phase II data that we released at the beginning of this year showed improvements in secretion scores and the number of glands secreting, and that was with a 6-week or 12-week course of therapy. So it's the same product. In one case, we dosed it for 6 weeks. In one case, we did 2 rounds of treatment. Both showed great improvements. So we saw great improvements at 6 weeks and then continued improvements at 12. And this opportunity represents probably a 20% to 30% expansion on the base use of XDEMVY today. So if you think about this, it would enhance that. It would open the door for this overlapping population by about 20% to 30% versus the base population we have today. These patients are typically identified very easily in the practice. Actually awareness for MGD is quite high. Doctors can see this. And typically, what they'll do is during an eye exam with the patient is complaining, they'll squeeze on the lower eyelid, and they'll express the meibum. And what they're looking for is that meibum should be clear, almost like an olive oil consistency. But if they express it and it looks waxy or toothpaste-like, then you've got meibomian gland disease. And what they're looking for is how many of these glands are actually secreting and how many of those glands are secreting oil that looks like olive oil, that clear liquid. And as I mentioned in our Phase IIa study, we saw improvement in both the number of glands secreting as well as the number of glands secreting that clear liquid. So today, what patients are doing is typically a compress, some type of thermal pulsation, maybe an in-office procedure where the doctor is heating up the glands and expressing the meibum, but nothing that really gets to a root cause where we know that the mites here are implicated. They caused inflammation, irritation, obstruction of the glands. So we do think that this is a very unique approach. And the data we've had so far, when physicians see this, is very compelling. And we expect to have a meaningful update here in the fourth quarter, additional data on the studies where we had a vehicle arm as well as other endpoints that we explored. I think that data will be released later this year. And if that's as compelling as the first set of data we released, I think we've got a really, really exciting opportunity for physicians to treat another component of lid disease.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#23

Great. Excellent. All right. And just in the few minutes that we have, like so just if you could like talk about the Lyme disease program, TP-05, just like frame the market opportunity here and any emerging competition that you're looking out for?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#24

Yes, the Lyme disease is a very exciting space that we really see a really significant need here, right? The case -- number of cases in the country are growing. Almost 30 million Americans are at risk of moderate to high exposure to Lyme disease. And what TP-05 would provide is an on-demand solution, an oral tablet that you could take. And within 24 hours, you would be protected from the bacteria that causes Lyme. And the way the drug works is essentially it would kill the tick before the tick can transmit the Lyme-causing bacteria. So it's very unique in that it's on demand, and it prevents any exposure to Lyme-causing bacteria totally. So this is an immune response. This is killing the tick before you get any exposure to the disease. And in the studies we looked at, we saw an immediate activation. So you took it within 24 hours, you had meaningful thresholds of drug that was killing ticks. It kills almost all that ticks that would be exposed to the patient. And then we challenged these patients to get it 30 days. So it's a durable treatment. So you could take this per se, once a month, and you could be covered. And in terms of competition, I think we look at this very differently. There's a vaccine that's being developed right now, and I think that's exciting for the space. But the challenges with vaccines are, it takes multiple doses over several months to reach immunity. Whereas our solution would be something you could take on demand and you get immunity right away. So if you're living in an endemic area and you're constantly exposed, perhaps you do a vaccine. But what if you're somebody that's only exposed seasonally or just going away for the weekend, this is going to apply to a broader swath of patients. It's going to be something that will empower patients to really prevent the disease themselves. We think it's going to have a higher utility and open a door for a broader patient set. And again, that initial data set was very compelling. And we're going to continue to have conversations with the agency to see what it would take to get this through pivotal studies. And candidly, this is an area that we think would be ideal for a great partnership. Obviously, the call point here would be primary care, a much broader audience than we pursue. So one that we expect to have more meaningful updates and then optimally look to partner with a larger organization.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#25

Got it. Okay. Yes. So that was going to bring me to my next question. I guess like how do you think about like partnerships overall? Like for the platform, is there -- I mean like Lyme disease is one, but are there any other areas that you think are amenable to like partnership to maximize the return on the assets? Or are some that you think that you can kind of like do it stand-alone on your own?

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#26

Certainly, I think the area to think about, which is obvious is the ex U.S. opportunity here, areas like Japan and Europe. We have an active partnership in China, as most folks are aware. And we'd be open to those. I think in terms of Europe, we're still doing the work, right? The reimbursement and regulatory pathway and evaluating, is that something we want to partner? Is that something we could do ourselves? We see very similar market dynamics versus the U.S. I think reimbursement is always a little different in Europe, obviously, unique by each country. So it's something we're doing the assessment on and looking at the best way to get that product available to those patients. And that could be something we do on our own. It could be something we look to partners as well. Japan would be another ideal market to find a partner. So we think about these ex U.S. opportunities, this opportunity as a potential partner. But certainly, we're also looking at the opportunities to go alone if that's what it takes.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#27

Yes. Okay. All right. That's great. Thank you so much for this. So we are almost at the end of our time. This was great. And yes, looking forward to keeping in touch, and good luck with all the progress that you've done and other initiatives that you have in the pipeline.

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#28

Great. Thanks so much, Ash. I really appreciate the time. And as you mentioned, really great time to share the story as we're on the heels of a great momentum in the early launch and now really getting to activate some really meaningful levers here in the fourth quarter to accelerate this launch with our sales force, the DTC. So I really appreciate the opportunity and really hope to keep everybody apprised of continued progress and great momentum as we move forward here.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#29

Yes. Great. All right. Thanks, Aziz. Have a good one.

Aziz Mottiwala

executive
#30

You, too. Thanks so much, Ash.

Ashwani Verma

analyst
#31

Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.