Home / Transcripts / STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA) · November 18, 2020

STMicroelectronics N.V. (STMPA) Earnings Call Transcript

November 18, 2020

Euronext Paris FR Information Technology Semiconductors and Semiconductor Equipment conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#1

Hello, everyone. I'm Dom Olszewski from Morgan Stanley. I cover European semis and tech hardware. We're delighted this morning to present from STMicroelectronics, Jean-Marc Chery, CEO; and Lorenzo Grandi, CFO; with Celine Berthier from IR. We'll be discussing a range of topics, of course. But as with other sessions, please feel free to drop in your questions on the chat on the website, and we'll look to integrate those as we go through today's conversation. So without further ado, welcome, Jean-Marc.

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#2

Thank you.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#3

And the first question is at a group level, perhaps could you comment on how you incorporate the view on the second lockdown, but also the auto revival as you think about the business going forward? What you're seeing in the latest demand trends and customer conversations?

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#4

Well, clearly, for the second -- what we call the second wave, okay, related to the COVID-19, we have adapt ourselves to the various, let's say, local decision from the countries. And of course, we are using extensively the work at home with clearly always the same objective. So the objective we set up, during the first wave, of course, it is protecting the health of our people. But here, we have, let's say, more experience in terms of, let's say, the basic rules you have to put in place and set up. And clearly, the first wave helped a lot. So we have taken a lot of lesson. For sure, we are not facing any issue in terms of supply chain for, let's say, protection equipment, so mask, for [ either ] alcoholic gel, for any test. So we well equipped ourselves to face the second wave. Fortunately, also, we pushed strongly our people to come back office end of June and July and in order to recreate really the sense of belonging and the social interaction across the various employees because we clearly acknowledge that during the first wave, many of them suffered. And that's the reason why we set up some psychological support when people feel bad staying permanently at home. And then the second objective, clearly, on top of the people is the business continuity because the situation is totally different, okay, H1 versus H2. If you remember, H1 ST delivered basically $4.3 billion revenue. And in H2, we will deliver about $5.7 billion -- close, okay, about $5.7 billion. So all our manufacturing infrastructure is really well loaded, well, except the pure legacy, mature legacy of automotive. But all the rest is really pretty well loaded. So the -- really the second objective is the business continuity and product supply chain for our customer. And then the third objective is protect, okay, the transformation programs and R&D programs we have for the company in order to put us in a condition for the future to achieve its strategic objective, either in terms of market share, in terms of customer and programs wins and in terms of the $12 billion objective that we have. So clearly, immediately facing the second wave, we moved to say, this is the 3 objectives, which are the top priority of the company. We moved massively at home, okay, for work for people which are not fully mandatory with adequate support in terms of IT tool and psychological support and management support, and really focusing a lot on manufacturing activities, R&D activities and transformation. Now, of course, we will have, let's say, learned many lessons from the first wave, which are very useful for the second wave. And -- but really market conditions for semiconductor are totally different. Because entering this year, 2019 was a challenging year with many uncertainties related to the trade-war between U.S.A. and China, related to China itself. Now second half of this year, we see some verticals with very strong dynamic, like personal electronic communication, infrastructure and computer. We see automotive coming back. We see electrification accelerating. We see digitalization in automotive accelerating. China, by the way, has recovered on V-shaped profile. And for the time being, Europe and America, expectations for next year are okay. So the way we manage the business and operation are really key in the current period. So this is the way we manage. And again, from an organization standpoint, all the management is, let's say, on board in the office to have all the infrastructure at our disposal. We have a corporate crisis team. We deployed this model in each site in the world. And we maintain a very close relationship with our business, with our customers in Europe and in America and in Asia, using all the tools, okay? So Zoom, Teams and Webex and so on. And fortunately, in Asia, people, they can travel again. So we can restart business development activities. And so this is the way we managed.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#5

At the ADG divisional update, there were some comments around strong visibility into the first half of '21. So could you maybe touch on sort of the elements and the conversational topics that have come up with customers to give you that that view, obviously, despite what we just described in terms of what we've learned from second -- from potential wave 1 into wave 2, COVID.

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#6

Well, again, there is, let's say, first, data point, okay, so fact we have. Well, first of all, okay, on the ADG, there is 2 parts. There is the legacy of the core electronic systems. And there is, let's say, the megatrend, so electrification and let's say, active safety, so intense digitalization towards Level 2, Level 2+ of ADAS. Well, these 2 megatrend -- I'll go fast, maybe you will have other question later on, on silicon carbide. So I will elaborate later on, on it. On legacy system electronics, okay? Well, we have seen since August, a sharp acceleration of the demand, so billing and booking. And on top of that, since August, the bookings are really following the dynamic of the billings with the book-to-bill ratio, well above the 1 -- let's say, well above 1.2. So means the visibility we have related to end of Q3 and Q4, I mean the breakdown of the booking now are, let's say, very adequate loading Q1. And the visibility we have on Q1 is really good. So that's the reason why we have a good confidence level on automotive, but also the rest of the business, about Q1. Moving throughout the quarter. So November and December, the order and entry now will start to address, let's say, end of Q1 and Q2. And looking at the dynamics, that's the reason why we say, well, the confidence level we have in Q2 is good. And also never forget that Q2 2020 was really the bottom. So for sure, Q2 2021 should be much better year-over-year compared to Q2 2020. Well, now, as usual, ST behavior is the following: we share with you this fact base. That's the reason why we say our sales and operating plan, which is covering Q4 to Q3 is driven by this element of fact, and we share with you. Then we know that to address the full year, we will have to wait, let's say, Q1 in order to confirm, overall, how 2021 will be. And that's the reason why we do not disclose yet any indication about 2021. But again, what we can say is looking at the dynamic we have, clearly, Q1 and most likely Q2 will be good. But now discussing with customers, Tier 1. All I can say, we do believe, we do prefer to discuss with carmakers, and clearly, what we are doing. Our assumption for next year for car -- so let's say, car produced production, the volume produced of car, our assumption is to be, let's say, between 80 million to 85 million vehicles, likely -- most likely 85 million of vehicles, which is, for sure, not yet the level of 2019, but certainly, going throughout the year after the lockdown we are facing today that smoothly we can expect to come back to 2019 level in terms of millions of vehicle produced more in 2022 or second half 2022 as a run rate of 2023. So this is what we try to assess discussing with carmakers. And basically, overall, this is what we can confirm today, based on our data point and discussing with carmakers to have an overall production vehicle of 85 million vehicles next year, will be certainly adequate as a tranche. But however, again, what will change is the mix. So first of all, the acceleration of electrical vehicle, either hybrid or fully-battery based, which basically should be able to double between 2020 to 2021. And for sure, here, it's good in terms of dollar content for silicon, including mild hybrid, hybrid and fully electrical base. Also, we are acknowledging that there is also innovation in the thermal combustion engine. Because never forget that the carmakers, they have to comply with the norms and regulation for environment average on the fleet. So clearly, they will ask more from electronics to help the thermal combustion engine to fulfill better the CO2 norms. And also, this is certainly the interest of the carmakers to produce and sell more mid-range and high-end vehicle rather than the low end. So there is also a mix effect, we have to take into account. So today, discussing with car maker. We are in this, let's say, mood as far as volumes are concerned. Well, that's the last element. For sure, this is a great industry, which is an industry of automobile of cars, are there to manage and face the biggest transformation ever done, so moving to electrification and active safety. And clearly, it will cost a lot of money for this industry in terms of capital expenditure but also R&D expense, engineering expense. And certainly, the pressure on the economics from cars to Tier 1, Tier 1 to Tier 2, will be huge. And we know this industry is working at 0 stock, is working with a strong price pressure because the affordability from -- of car for end customer is very important factors as well as a consumer experience, more and more, but the affordability is an important factor. So we prepare ourselves, let's say, to receive, let's say, price pressure most likely more bigger than in the past, which was already strong. So that is why we prefer to discuss with carmakers on forecast rather than with Tier 1 because with Tier 1, the discussion is a very fast-moving on price.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#7

So you raised a very interesting point there in terms of the transition being sort of a once-in-a-generation type event for the auto market, right? And I'm very curious on your conversations then as you go direct the carmakers. There's one element here which is moving from the combustion engine to some form of new powertrain, whether that's mild hybrids or up to full battery electric. But given the acceleration in policies from a -- whether that's a European level or whether that's the Chinese targets or whether that's places like California. Do you sense that automakers are deciding in your conversations to say, well, we need to actually accelerate the pure BEV and for some of the hybrid opportunities are less appealing? Or do you think, no, this will be [ stuff ]. There is still a capital commitment to go down this spectrum over time.

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#8

So can you rephrase exactly the question?

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#9

Just in terms of are automakers still committed to hybrid and mild hybrids along the way and the content opportunity there. And then -- or are you actually seeing, you know what, this is such a transformational moment that you sort of have to go from 0 to 1, so you focus on the BEVs. And what are your OEM conversations indicating there?

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#10

Okay. No, no, clearly, okay, we will face, let's say, a transition phase because also it's a question of economics because, believe me, the car architecture of a full battery car, electrical vehicles in terms of, let's say, powertrain is really different from a thermal combustion engine. So it costs us a lot of money. But there is no other way from carmakers to enter -- extensively insert in their fleet in each model, pure battery-based electrical car. And you see the Volkswagen Group, they have introduced their new car. I have seen recently Austin Mini. So you can imagine Austin Mini few years ago full electrical battery base. Most likely, Ferrari will do the same, Maserati. So nobody will escape this transformation. But then, there is the speed, you can adapt yourself, where you have a legacy in terms of supply chain based on thermal combustion engine, gasoline and diesel to a full battery-based. It will take 20 years. You cannot overnight do it. Or if some people are pushing to do it, well, they will have to explain to the millions of [ employed ] people, why they have done it. And so I do believe that the right recipe will be to go smoothly and the semiconductor industry will be a key enabler to support the car industry to make this transformation smooth, offering a mix of, let's say, electrical battery-based vehicles, hybrid and thermal combustion engine optimized. Now which relative percentage we will have by 2025, 2030, well, I think, okay, the carmakers, they are, let's say, in better position to communicate on it. But what I am pretty sure is that our industry, semiconductor and especially, ST because it is our strategy, we will be key to enable this transformation successfully, let's say, in a way where the car will be able to make this transformation at a decent, let's say, cost and expenses. And the semiconductor industry will be capable to self-finance the effort in order to support it. Well, other aspect, you have to take into consideration is that on top of this, let's say, electrical transformation, you will have 2 other aspects. It is the safety, the active safety. So all the cars will have to be equipped with Level 2, Level 2+ or Level 3, let's say, ADAS, let's say, features. If not, they will not be able to be compliant. And the third point, which will be important, is a consumer experience because more and more the consumer feelings, the new way to consume mobility will be, let's say, fragmented because you will have still some [ Dinozzo ] like me loving thermal combustion engine with the sound and so on and so forth and driving my car. And you will have generation sharing mobility, more interested by connectivity, feeling consumer experience. All in all, it will really transform the way the carmakers will design the architecture of the car. Again, one example, Marco Monti shared during the Capital Markets Day is architecture by domain. Because it is driven by 2 things: first, for the carmakers, to have the capability to easily upgrade the software -- to update the software over the year of the car because with the current very fragmented ECUs is basically impossible. This is point number one. The point number two, it's also modifying the software. You can modify the consumer experience with the same electronic platform from a hardware point of view. And this is also is important transformation. So that's the reason why I shared with you a few minutes ago that this industry is really facing the biggest transformation ever faced because they are playing 3 things in the same time, electrification, digitalization for active safety and digitalization for consumer experience, covering for important R&D and CapEx, transforming this industry because now this industry will be the fastest adopter of new technology. So whatever it's CMOS, advanced CMOS, now a vision processor must run on the 5-nanometer and tomorrow on the 3-nanometer technology. In same time, the application process are doing for smartphone. So this industry will adopt the new technology very fast. For power is the same. Look at silicon carbide. So the automotive industry adopt the silicon carbide before the industrial market. GaN will be the same. Most likely, automotive industry will adopt GaN in similar things. So you see this industry also will become the fast adopter of new semiconductor technology. So it's really a major transformation we are facing is really fascinating. And again, that's the reason why the semiconductor industry will be the key enabler of this transformation. And the reason why more and more, we have interaction, either with carmakers and Tier 1 in order to exchange about the way we will manage it.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#11

Very clear. So I'm assuming a lot of questions on a topic, you can very well probably guess, which is the next topic of silicon carbide. I just try to wrap up few questions together here. So maybe a start-up one is to, could you discuss sort of linearity or trajectory that you might expect as you move towards the long-term $1 billion revenue target that you took towards the middle of the decade? Will that be linear? Does that require volume assumptions? Where -- at what point are we going to see more meaningful ramp-ups? And what kind of milestones should investors look for along the way?

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#12

Well, clearly, here, of course, I am communicated about our engagement to deliver $1 billion of revenue from silicon carbide. We start from scratch basically in 2017. So in 8 years, we have to deliver $1 billion. So this is an engagement, commitment from the company, and we are driving our CapEx, our assets, our strategy based on this sales and operating plan. Then this plan is endorsed and is sustained by, let's say, 3 big blocks. Now, the first one is the well-known cooperation with Tesla. And I have to say, when you assess -- and it's public information, the Tesla plan, where basically this year, they started Shanghai activities, and they will ramp the Shanghai infrastructure at the level of Fremont by end of next year. Second half of next year, they will start-up Berlin infrastructure. And most likely, if I have well understood, they intend to start Austin one. Now I have to say the plan of Tesla is definitively consistent with our objective in terms of contribution of $1 billion. And looking at the market share we have with Tesla on silicon carbide, I have to say their contribution will be instrumental to this plan. But then, we have the 68 engaged program [indiscernible] with a customer. So half are for industrial and half are for automotive. Well, here, you have to acknowledge that it is very fragmented. You have, for sure, big OEM. And the faster to start will be in Asia. And here, in 2021, we will have a material revenue from Asian OEM, either carmaker or Tier 1 on silicon carbide, several dozen of million of dollars. And then, we will have the other OEM platform starting in 2022 and 2023 and 2024 in Europe and in America, according the timing, we agreed in terms of sampling delivery, our discussion with the purchasing and qualification or time frame. And then you have the other parts, which are industrial, which is much more fragmented. But the company absolutely want not to neglect, even if by program the volume are much lower, but the company want to address both industrial market and automotive. If questions could raise to say, but do you believe these 68 program can generate more than $1 billion. Maybe yes, okay? Because you -- we have the bandwidth. We have the capability to develop in parallel, these 70 program basically. And here, never forget that there is, let's say, no software content. It's more hardware and technology. So we have this capability to develop. But it's another thing to say, the company is committed on the sales and operating plan of $1 billion and is driving its investment and resources consistently. And here, I have to say all the milestone of this program are on track. We have demonstrated our capability to support Tesla. So we never put them in difficulties versus their plan. So they rely on ST as a unique supplier. We will offer them dual source on both assembly and test and wafer fab by end of 2021 with Shenzhen [indiscernible] for assembly and Singapore and Catania for wafer fab. We have dual source in terms of raw material. We will offer a third internal source by 2023, 2024, growing our internal raw materials. So this is point number one. So I do believe that Tesla, as far as the perform according plan is an important milestone. And then for the rest, we are monitoring all the programs and we are executing. If at a certain moment, we have material evidence that we can do better, of course, we will communicate. But for the time being of our engagement is $1 billion, okay? And everything is on track to do it and achieve it.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#13

Okay. Turning to another investor question that's very popular today is we've seen announcements from a few other companies around gaining licenses recently for selling components to Huawei. So if that's something you'd like to comment on, given that you've obviously talked about the Q4 guidance, assuming 0 contribution from that?

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#14

No. We have -- well, first of all, I confirm that in Q4, we will have 0 revenue with Huawei or HiSilicon because we need to associate both, either addressing the personal electronic markets or communication infrastructure. We requested the license on time. Let's say, on, let's say, breaking down our demand between personal electronics, computer and communication infrastructure and breaking down between 4G and 5G in order to make the U.S. administration work as easy as possible. Well, unfortunately, at this stage, we have no feedback. Now I committed the market that when we will receive a license, we will communicate on it because it is material information. So for the time being, no feedback, and I confirm to you that Q4 revenue will be 0 for Huawei, unfortunately, as I have said, after a 30 consecutive quarters of growth with this customer, both on communication infrastructure and personal electronics.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#15

Okay. Turning to the Microcontroller business, which is, for the last many years, has grown very strongly. But from a global perspective, has got a #1 position in China, in particular. Q3 saw very strong Microcontroller contribution as you commented previously. So could you comment on growth from here? And sort of over a medium-term perspective? And also what you're seeing in terms of Chinese competition? And what are you seeing locally as driving forces there? And how do you compete with that?

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#16

So first of all, to restate clearly, what is happening this year, I think there is many factors, which have enabled our capability to certainly finish the year with about 20% of market share on the general purpose and secure microcontroller, making ST a solid #2 company. First of all, our portfolio on both on general purpose and secure with embedded Secure Element and NFC, our portfolio is wide and strong. And the ecosystem, we have developed around means, the tool set we offer to designer to easily design their home device, embedding our microcontroller, is clearly very important competitive factor. Then the second element important is that we enter in the year in 2020 with, let's say, 2 important factors. First, the inventory level at distribution channel level, very lean, very healthy across all the regions, so Asia and Europe and America. And that's the reason why, when Asia restarted following a V-shaped recovery in March, clearly, ST, we have enjoyed immediately from POS, a strong POP. And basically, this is what we forecast as well for Europe and America timely. So this is the second element. The third element is programs with key OEM because microcontrollers are proliferating very widely in personal electronics. In accessories, in wearable, the microcontroller is a key element. Our embedded processing solutions are a key element of the bill of material of all these wearables, accessories, devices. And in 2020, this business has boomed because of the stay-at-home effect and so on and so forth. So lean inventory, so immediate start of the POP, when POS restarted in Asia and now Europe and America. And the effect of personal electronics linked to stay at home. Well, and then last but not the least, which is a reality, is our supply chain. Because we have for Microcontrollers, a mix and match supply chain between internal manufacturing and external foundries, mainly U.K. is well known, mainly TSMC. Well, this supply chain, first of all, demonstrated a strong resilience crossing the outbreak, point number one. Point number two, ST, we continue to invest in capacity increase in our fab and assembly plant to support these microcontroller activities because it is in the core of our strategy. And we find the way with our external partner to sell us adequate volumes to support us, even if I have to fairly say that the flexibility at foundry level in the current period is starting to be very minimum because they're, let's say, pretty, pretty well loaded. So because of these 4 elements, new product portfolio, entering the year with programs with OEM, with a lean situation, enjoying personal electronics, POS in Asia and the fact that we have enabled a strong supply chain, yes, ST this year will overperform the market by far, and we'll achieve a 20% market share. But for next year, we do believe that Asia will continue steadily on this way. But of course, we'll have not again a V-shaped recovery because it is done. So now it will follow a similar path. Discussing with the European partner, an American partner at distribution level, they have a good confidence level for next year. So this is something, of course, we have to monitor. And today, I have to say that, yes, the POS in Europe is starting to grow sequentially, not yet completely over here, but at least sequentially, it is showing good sign. In America, it is sequential, but start to be over here as well. So that's the reason why we have no reason to think that next year will be bad for microcontrollers from Europe and America, and we have expectation of growth. Well, about the Chinese. Yes, it is clear that Chinese players are there. Clearly, they have been triggered, partially as an application of the trade war between U.S.A. and China. They deliver, good quality. Never, you will see me bashing the Chinese competition about their quality because basically, they use TSMC or UMC as a foundry. Maybe where they are a bit less efficient than us is on their ecosystem. And certainly, in terms of embedded processing solution with connectivity or security feature, they are not at the same level of innovation. But for sure, on the, let's say, mainstream of microcontroller, let's say, I don't commit low end because I don't like low end, I say, on this kind of, let's say, application, yes, they are very active. And everywhere, company like ST is failing in the capability to supply, of course, there is a Chinese player capable to take the circuit and to supply. But again, on microcontrollers, we know that -- and you know this product are quite sticky because there is many implication behind in terms of software. But this is certainly competition, we will never neglect and underestimate because we see them very active, it's for real, and it has been accelerated as unfortunately an application of the trade war between U.S. and China.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#17

Thanks, Jean. Very clear. Sure we have plenty more to discuss, some more questions coming through, but we'll change just out of time at this point. So I'd just like to say thank you very much, Jean-Marc. Thank you to STMicro, and thank you to the investors for listening today.

Jean-Marc Chery executive
#18

Thank you very much. Bye-bye.

Dominik Olszewski analyst
#19

Okay. Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete STMicroelectronics N.V. transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to STMicroelectronics N.V. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.