Home / Transcripts / Dr. Martens plc (DOCS) · January 19, 2023

Dr. Martens plc (DOCS) Earnings Call Transcript

January 19, 2023

London Stock Exchange GB Consumer Discretionary Textiles, Apparel and Luxury Goods trading_statement 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator operator
#1

Good morning, and welcome to Dr. Martens' FY '23 Q3 Trading Update. My name is Harry, and I'll be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand you over to Kenny Wilson, CEO, to begin. Kenny, please go ahead.

Kenneth Wilson executive
#2

Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. And firstly, a big thank you for joining our Q3 results call at such short notice. We've obviously accelerated this call due to a significant reduction to our FY '23 forecast. This is something that I am extremely disappointed about. This disappointment is even greater because a large part of our miss should have been within our control, and it is a people and process failure. Due to a large operational challenge in our new Los Angeles distribution center and weaker-than-expected DTC trading in the United States, we now expect full year revenue growth of 11% to 13% on an actual currency basis and full year EBITDA between GBP 250 million and GBP 260 million. We are also reducing guidance for FY '24, which Jon will cover in more detail later on this call. However, let me start by explaining the operational challenge, the full extent of which is just emerging and how we are going to fix this. Our new Los Angeles DC opened in July 22 now has a significant bottleneck. They are dealing with considerably more inventory than planned. What this means is much lower throughput than planned. This has been caused by 3 main factors. Firstly, we plan to exit our old Portland distribution center by the end of September '22. Our U.S.A. operations team decided to ship all Portland stock to LA early, putting pressure on our capacity. Secondly, some key customers asked us to reroute direct orders to LA DC as they had their own distribution capacity challenges. The U.S.A. team agreed to this. Thirdly, and ironically, transit times from our suppliers to our LA DC improved a lot versus our plan, meaning that more inventory arrived to LA earlier than we had in our plan. The 3 factors individually, we could have coped with any of these factors but not all 3 together. So that is the situation, but most importantly, what are we going to do to solve this? Firstly, we have secured 3 over flew distribution centers to store the goods. This is expensive but lower cost than storing product in containers or at port, as Jon is going to outline. Secondly, we will be adding a third shift to our Los Angeles DC from the end of January into early February. You may ask yourselves, why are they not dealing with this faster? That's because we have to purchase forklifts. We have to find supervisors and the people to run this additional shift, but this will increase our throughput. Thirdly, we will accelerate the expansion of our East Coast New Jersey distribution center, which was already in our strategic plan. From July, this DC will be fully operational for both direct-to-consumer and wholesale to support the Autumn/Winter '23 season. And today, this DC already handles direct-to-consumer with a smaller assortment of product. Number four, we have quickly formed a focused task force of our best distribution experts who will support our U.S.A. team in fixing these issues. We expect the situation will improve month by month, but it will be during Q2 of FY '24 before these issues are fully resolved. I want to be clear that this is about having too much of the right product at the LA DC, and it is not a seasonal markdown problem. We've told you many times before, the continuity nature of Dr. Martens product and the 4 of every 5 pairs, which we sell are black. Moving to the second issue of U.S.A. direct-to-consumer. In December, our U.S.A. DTC business delivered 12% constant currency growth, a good performance, but this was below our expectations. Seasonal weather patterns drove a channel shift in the United States within the period. Our wholesale customers sold 32% more pairs to consumers in the month of December, which was a very strong performance. We believe this will have been driven by heavy storms which hit U.S.A. in late December, meaning that customers shopped more locally and outside of key cities. Jon will focus more on the U.S.A. DTC business in a moment. Overall, in December, our global DTC business traded plus 20% on last year, demonstrating the strength of the Dr. Martens brand. This was driven by excellent EMEA performance with direct-to-consumer mix reaching 66% in EMEA in the quarter. However, today, that is overshadowed by our very disappointing forecast reduction driven by the issues that I've outlined. With that, I'm going to hand over to Jon to talk about our Q3 numbers, the bridge between our 2 forecasts, and then we'll take a Q&A.

Jon Mortimore executive
#3

Thank you, Kenny. I'll talk you through our Q3 performance and economic implications of the significant operational issues which created the bottleneck at the LA DC, the new expectation and guidance for FY '23 and finally, early guidance for FY '24. This is disappointing. For the third quarter, in the quarter, total revenue grew by 9% to GBP 336 million. This was up 3% on a constant currency basis. D2C revenue grew 11% or 6% constant currency to reach a mix of 65%. Wholesale was poor and declined by 1% at constant currency. As we said at the half year, trading through October and November was variable, and across these 2 months together, D2C was up 5% but down 1% on a constant currency basis. We had a better December with D2C up 20% or 16% constant currency led by an excellent EMEA retail performance, which grew by 48% on a constant currency basis. D2C in America was up 12% in the month of December on a constant currency basis. However, this was below our expectation. Wholesale shipments across all regions were in line with plan in October and November. However, wholesale had a poor month in December, which was all in America. Year-to-date revenue was GBP 755 million, up 12% actual currency or 5% on a constant currency basis. Turning to the financial impacts for FY '23 and economic implications of the LA DC bottleneck that Kenny explained. We have today reduced our full year guidance for revenue growth to between 11% and 13%, which is 4% to 6% on a constant currency basis. This is broadly in line with the year-to-date performance. EBITDA is estimated to be between GBP 250 million and GBP 260 million. The reduction in both revenue and EBITDA is all in America. Both EMEA and Asia Pacific are trading in line with our expectations. As Kenny has described, in America, the LA DC bottleneck has resulted in a ceiling to the wholesale volume we can pick and pack, which is lower than our expectation through the fourth quarter. This ceiling reduces full year revenue -- or full year wholesale revenue, sorry, by GBP 15 million, which cost about GBP 8 million of EBITDA. In addition, the distribution costs and supply chain costs expected to be incurred to resolve this bottleneck are around GBP 8 million. Lower-than-anticipated DTC trading in America experienced through Q3 is estimated to continue through Q4 and reduces revenue by a further GBP 15 million and EBITDA by a further GBP 10 million. The difference in guidance between 13% growth and 11% growth is predominantly in relation to the pace at which we can fix the bottleneck, as Kenny had explained, and subsequently normalize our operations. Turning to FY '24. The knock-on effects from the LA DC bottleneck and uncertain economic outlook will impact revenue growth for that year. As we have explained, it will take time to fully optimize the operational capacity of the New Jersey DC, which we anticipate will not be complete until towards the end of the first half. Secondly, we have taken the strategic decision to reduce the volume we sell into etailers accounts in EMEA. And whilst this will underpin D2C mix expansion in the outyears, this will reduce revenue in the year of implementation. Thirdly, we've taken a more cautious outlook in relation to the economic environment in our core markets. As a result of the above, we now guide FY '24 growth to be in a range of mid to high single digits on a constant currency basis. Finally, from me, whilst this is all incredibly disappointing, our underlying economic model and strategy do not change. D2C is 4x more profitable in wholesale. We have material white space growth opportunity in our core markets. The brand is strong. Our underlying fundamentals are unchanged. Thank you. We can now move on to Q&A.

Operator operator
#4

[Operator Instructions] And our first question of the day is from the line of David Roux of Bank of America.

David Roux analyst
#5

Kenny and Jon, just 2 questions from my side. Just to clarify, you mentioned some impact on the wholesale shipments in Q4 from this issue. What was the impacts in Q3 -- sorry, in Q3 on growth, I mean compared to the 3% constant currency that you printed. And then secondly, if I look at the bridge between your previous guide and the new guide, I get to a difference of around about GBP 40 million. I think about half of that can be explained by the DC issue. What is driving the other GBP 20 million?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#6

Okay. On your Q3 request, we were expecting small single-digit growth in the quarter, [indiscernible] constant currency [indiscernible] that was all in the U.S. In relation to your second question, it's all one's view on DTC in U.S. As I said, EMEA and Asia Pacific are trading in line. The guide I gave was in relation versus average consensus. So it's broadly U.S. DTC and U.S. wholesale shipments, depending on one's view of what they were going to be.

David Roux analyst
#7

Okay. So in the new guide other than the DC issues, there does seem to be a bit more conservatism both in -- relating to the U.S.? Is that my understanding correct?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#8

That is correct, David, yes.

Operator operator
#9

Our next question is from the line of Karina Nugent of Goldman Sachs.

Karina Shooter analyst
#10

And it's fairly similar, but more focused on 2024. Compared to the mid-teens, medium-term guidance that you gave IPO, that mid- to high single-digit figure at constant currency is quite different to that. How much of that lowering of expectations is on the -- kind of underlying trends you're seeing in the consumer versus the other issues that you've highlighted in terms of distribution?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#11

[indiscernible] backwards. I think it's fair to say that you think this -- we take this a different way, but I'll answer your question. The LA DC, we believe, will be fixed by the end of the first half. That has an impact. And that will cause a range depending on the pace we can fix that. We believe the reduction to etailers to be about 3 to 4 percentage points of growth. And then the balance will be one's view of where the world economy is going. It's -- I don't really want to give that away, but the etailers thing is 3% to 4%. To that point, Karina, I think, versus the IPO which was January 2021, we think the consumer outlook is definitely more bleak. And therefore, we've reflected that in the guidance, which Jon has updated.

Karina Shooter analyst
#12

And just a follow-up to that, Jon, you've been really helpful in the past providing building blocks to your guidance. And I presume, the [indiscernible] in terms of pricing DTC haven't really changed. So the balance would be like-for-like volume?

Jon Mortimore executive
#13

That would be correct. And that, I think, is [ valid ]. That comes through one's view of the underlying economic health of the core -- of the core markets we traded. What we are very confident, as we said at the half year and still today with some of the data points we've seen, the brand is still very strong. It is all underlying trading and consumer confidence in our core markets.

Kenneth Wilson executive
#14

And obviously, there could be, Karina, if you were looking at this, appears impact still of what I outlined that it will take a bit of time to strategically fix all of the challenges in the U.S. around distribution. Some of these things will happen quickly, but some won't be fully fixed until we ended the second quarter.

Operator operator
#15

[Operator Instructions] And our next question is from the line of Piral Dadhania of Royal Bank of Canada.

Piral Dadhania analyst
#16

Kenny, Jon. I just wanted to ask about the midterm growth profile for the business similar to the previous question. Obviously, we're moving from what we discussed in 2021, which was sort of high teens. I think the expectation is a bit more sort of mid-teens. Could you just give us an indication if we will take a step back where -- what the growth profile for Dr. Martens could look like on a midterm basis? I appreciate we're in a slightly difficult spot. But really, what we're going to -- what you're guiding to is 2023 revenue growth of mid-single-digit, 2024 revenue growth of mid- to high single digit. So we're quite a far cry away from where we were just a few years ago. So as we think about the future potential for this business, where should we hang our hat. Is it sort of 10%? Is it lower than that? Because it doesn't feel like we can be baking in growth numbers in the teens at this moment in time. So I would just like to hear your thoughts on that, if possible.

Kenneth Wilson executive
#17

Yes, I think that's a very fair question. Clearly, when we IPO-ed the company, we said we will be growing mid-teens other than the first year where we said we would go high teens than we did. I think the destination hasn't really changed here. What has changed, to your point, is the shape of the journey and clearly reflecting the macro consumer environment, which we think will be is through financial year '24. We guided to mid- to high single digits. We believe going forward beyond that year that we can start to increase the growth profile of the company. We still believe that we've got strong brands. We've demonstrated that we have the power to increase prices and nothing has changed around the white space growth opportunity, you saw in our European markets over the holiday period and some of those new markets that we've converted back are delivering very high growth rates and we have a short-term problem here in the United States, and we have to solve that, hence, the reason why we've changed the FY '24 guidance. So it's the shape of the journey that's changed, not the destination.

Jon Mortimore executive
#18

I think -- you think the cost is one of the key economic drivers is DTC mix shift. So last year, we had 49% of revenue through DTC. As we just reported this year-to-date improved DTC mix by 2 percentage points. That end DTC is 4x more profitable than wholesale. That key driver still valid. The -- as Kenny said, the white space growth opportunity is still valid. And I think what we're looking at here is actually pace of expanding into that white space growth as opposed to anything else. And that -- going back which is the etailers strategic decision we've taken, that will help underpin and drive in the out years DTC mix expansion. It's just a timing issue as we come out of those etailers until we get transfer into our own channels.

Piral Dadhania analyst
#19

Sure. But I mean if I could and with all due respect, I appreciate all the levers that you've just identified, Jon. But in 2021, this was actually -- we were talking about volume growth -- volume-led revenue growth strategy. And that's kind of the elephant in the room, which is, in my opinion, kind of, there is a slowdown in the volume growth. I think the previous question alluded to that. So it's just the extent to which that is still valid in the overall sort of profile at this point? Or -- I appreciate with the other levers, but I think that maybe where the market and investors will focus, it's just on the core piece, which is actually the underlying volumes and what's going on there, and the extent to which that can grow in the midterm. That's really the focus of my question.

Jon Mortimore executive
#20

No, you're absolutely right. It is a volume-led plan and volumes is the explanation of growing into the white space growth opportunity. I think the reason that volumes will be slower for the next 12, 18 months is a reflection of the current economic environment we are all facing to ensure a weaker consumer and -- weaker consumer spending. I don't think -- so I think that's the core driver for a weaker -- for slower volume growth or weaker volumes, whichever words you want to use.

Piral Dadhania analyst
#21

Okay. And just in terms of timing, obviously, it's only been something like 8 or 9 weeks since your half year results, maybe even a bit less than that. I appreciate the LA DC as something that was maybe outside of your purview until quite recently. But could you just help us understand what's changed in terms of your thinking from then to now? Why are you now much more bearish on the U.S. outlook than you were 7, 8 weeks ago and any other factors that relate to the underlying business problems than the one-off factors that we -- that you've already kindly run through?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#22

I mean from my perspective, I think when we stood up at the end of November, the wholesale piece in the U.S., we had no awareness of that issue because we were shifting high double digit of the prior year. So that piece takes care of it. Jon gave 2 big assumptions. The first was that there was a weaker base in Europe that we thought would come through in December and has come through. He also said that we would benefit to improve availability in the United States, and we would improve off the back of that better availability in the United States. We didn't improve as much as we had expected in our DTC channel with only 12% constant currency growth. So we missed. However, what we did see, and as I said earlier, I think that was due to weather driving a channel shift -- back to your payers question, we sold 32% more payers through wholesale in North America in December. So we have reflected out the fact that our DTC channel has not delivered what we wanted, and that is the assumption that clearly, you can point to just was a miss versus what we say.

Jon Mortimore executive
#23

And just to build -- sorry, one more build as well, when we stood up at the half year, we had seen early data for the Black Friday side of -- trading weekend in the U.S., and that was a good performance. And I think I shared that as the only data point to support that we had at that moment in time, the benefit from availability.

Operator operator
#24

Next question today is from the line of Edouard Aubin of Morgan Stanley.

Edouard Aubin analyst
#25

Hello Kenny and Jon. So 2, 3 questions from me. So first of all, you mentioned the hit from the etailers, 3% to 4%. Why the change of mind regarding your distribution strategy? What's happening there? Is it because these guys are too promotional and impacting the brand? Or just curious to have an explanation there, so that would be number one. And then just to follow up on the question about volume because with mid-single-digit organic, it looks like your volumes are now flat to down or you're expecting them to be flat to down -- is it -- and then you've mentioned many times before on this call that you wanted to act as curators of the brand, which is obviously great for the brand equity, desirability at long term. But have you -- are you now in a scenario where most of your competitors are heavily discounting and that's impacting basically, I mean, the value proposition is maybe not as attractive as you've raised prices over the past few months? And then sorry, a third small technical one, just to clarify. I think, Jon, you said that your DTC growth in the U.S. was up 12%, if I understood correctly in Q3. But did you also mention that wholesale sellout was at 32%? And if so, why is the difference.

Kenneth Wilson executive
#26

Edouard. I'll take the question around etailers and your point about heavy discounting in the market, and I'll let Jon take the financial and technical questions. In terms of the question about etailers over the last -- it's a European point just to be super clear, and it's not relating to the other territories. So in Europe, the brand awareness is growing, and it's growing every quarter. And there's no doubt that our wholesale strategy has helped us to introduce more consumers to the Dr. Martens brand. What we've discussed with our key etail partners in Europe is the fact that we want to focus them on a different product range from some of the products they have been selling and focus some of those products on our own DTC channels. So we'll continue to trade with etailers going forward. We're not eliminating etailers, and we've got some good strategic partnerships there. But we will curate the products that we put into that channel and we will direct consumers for other products towards our own DTC channel. So that's really what we're trying to do. It's a product and brand point, which is we want to direct different products to different channels. Then in terms of discounting, yes, you're right. There was a lot of discounting out in the marketplace across December, in particular, but really from the Black Friday weekend through to Christmas. We only participated in that in a very small way through some seasonal markdowns that we took in our 2 biggest markets in EMEA and in North America. And we've said all along, we don't discount the iconic product of the Dr. Martens brand because we believe that the way to build long-term brand value is to have an honest relationship with consumers, but if they want to buy a pair of Black of Dr. Martens, they know what the price is always going to be. I still believe that is absolutely the right decision for the long term, but will consumers have spent their pound or their euro or their dollar on something that was so heavily discounted. Yes, but I don't think that's the right way to manage the brand for the long term. So we will not be in an environment of heavy discounting. It's not the right thing to do.

Jon Mortimore executive
#27

On your second question on volume, at what -- the way to think about it is -- the volumes will be probably flat to lower next year depending on the expectations primarily because of taking out the volume that we sell into European etailers. A way to think or a simple bridge for next year's growth would be along the lines of -- we've announced price growth of 6%. We've got -- we'll have the benefit of annualizing approximately 44 stores that we've opened this year, including the Japanese transfer into next year. Then there's obviously the reduction from etailer volume. There will be a DTC mix shift, and I said to date 9 months this year, it's plus 2. And then that will be one's view of what is underlying growth in core markets, depending on the economic environments there, and that might be flat pair marginal reduction in pairs or increasing the pairs depending on which market you look about. But that's the way to look about the key driver for volume reduction next year, lower volumes is the volumes we're taking out of European etailers. With regards to your final question on December trading for the Americas business, the classification, you're absolutely right, in the month of December, DTC in America grew revenue by 12% at constant currency, which is about pay as up as much flat to up as much. Wholesale sellout to the wholesale final customer was up 32% in December, and that was volume. And as Kenny answered your first question, that was volume all at full price as we have mapped pricing in the U.S. So payers to final customers in the U.S. in December was essentially probably combined B2C and B2B up mid-20s, something like that. So that gives us confidence that we can sell in. Our hypothesis of what happened in December is that the extreme cold weather it's incredible what happened there. But we have almost seen news about snow and cold weather. That pushed people away from the larger cities where our stores are located to more local shopping, which is where the vast majority of the wholesale distribution is where the thousands of stores, and we've got what about 50 stores that are in the bigger cities. That's our hypothesis of what happened. But the key is pairs growth into the market DTC and wholesale together to end consumers up mid-20s, and that's a positive.

Operator operator
#28

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from the line of Richard Taylor of Barclays.

Richard Taylor analyst
#29

I've got 3 questions, please. One is again on the U.S. I know you just described in great detail in December, but can you just talk in general about the U.S. business? Because it looks like the other territories you're sort of satisfied with, but the U.S. has been poor overall just standing back, what is it that you're unhappy with in that business or perhaps it's not hitting well as with other markets? Secondly, globally, what's reordering been like from wholesale accounts into FY '24. What's the sell-through been like? And are they reordering at the higher prices? And how does that inform your revenue growth guidance for next year? And then finally, you've not talked about margins for next year. We can work out roughly a margin range for this year, given the data you've given today, but what are the thoughts on EBITDA margin into next year, please?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#30

Yes. I mean I think in your first question, Richard, the businesses in Asia Pacific and EMEA came in exactly in line with what we'd expected. In fact, EMEA did a little bit better than we expected. The U.S. business. Clearly, the performance is not where we want it to be across the whole -- I think the quarter rather than the month of December. The quarter was disappointing. And as we said, when we stood up in November, we felt at that point that, that was due to unseasonably warm weather. December, our sales out through our own channels at 12% up, was up, but it wasn't up as much as we wanted. So we're disappointed in that. And then actually, our sales out to consumers through wholesale at plus 31% actually was very strong. Our sales into wholesale, which you can see from our numbers, we're terrible based on the distribution issue. And overall, we didn't deliver what we said we were going to do in the U.S. business. So we've got to be disappointed in our own performance there. But the fact we sold significantly, more payers in December says people still wanted to buy the Dr. Martens brand. So that would be my view on it. We've got work to do clearly. If you don't deliver your numbers, then you've got to be disappointed in your own performance. In terms of your point about global reordering, we know the order file for spring/summer '23 because that -- those bookings have been taken for Jan, Feb, March, April, May, June -- we're in a situation where we're happy with those orders. The United States, as we've said today, we won't be able to ship all the orders we've got ironically because of the issue we've got in the Los Angeles distribution center. So we're going to have to pick and choose exactly which orders out of those we were able to ship. If we look at the Autumn Winter '23 season, which is still the biggest part of financial year '24, but at a point of a little visibility, unfortunately, at the moment. And what I mean by that is it will be another 3 or 4 weeks before we really firm up the order file. Hence, why in our guidance for next year, we're being cautious on payers because we don't know the answer yet. But usually, people ordering is a function of how they're selling out. So I've got nothing to believe that in the guidance Jon has given we won't meet the payers' numbers that we've got embedded in there, but we won't know the true answer until we take all of the orders that will come into '23.

Jon Mortimore executive
#31

And building on that and picking up on your last question, we purposely have not guided around EBITDA margin for the next financial year because of -- as Kenny said, we're at the point of minimum visibility. The current issue is here is really fast this week, and we need to work through what all of this means in much more detail and we'll come back at an appropriate time.

Richard Taylor analyst
#32

Just on the second point on the wholesale reordering. I mean I think in the previous statement, Jon sort of noted to the position of the key wholesalers. What is that like? Your points of low visibility, I understand that, but have they sold through well, your prices are going up. What are the conversations like with those wholesalers? What's your degree of confidence in them reordering next autumn winter at those higher prices given their balances at the moment?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#33

Yes. I mean -- I think if you look at the situation, Richard, we mentioned that people had healthy inventories going into peak wholesale. And I think the plus 31% payers in the United States in December demonstrates they had the stock. We're in the ironic situation that people will be sold out of certain sizes on certain products. But we've got an order file, which was pre-booked that we have to ship first. So we won't be able to replenish everything that people have sold out. We have visibility on our inventories of our top 10 accounts. Again, because we saw good sales in December and our U.S. team updated us at Wholesale, the December momentum has continued into January, that will further bring down inventory in the wholesale channel. So as Jon said in November, we believe that we'll exit this financial year end of March with our key wholesale accounts with our inventories in better shape than they were at the same time the previous year. So that's America. I think for Europe, Europe's wholesale sales were absolutely in line with expectations. A couple of accounts did better. We haven't got all the sellout numbers yet for Europe in the way that we've gone through in infinite detail for the United States. But I'm very comfortable we get the inventory week on week, and I'm very comfortable with where we are on wholesale inventories in EMEA. So other than the payers that we are going to take out with our retailer partners. I think -- again, I don't have the order book yet. But I feel pretty good about how the order book is evolving in EMEA, and they're actually slightly ahead on timing versus the Americas business on getting those orders in. And then in Asia Pacific, there's only real one big, what you call a wholesale customer which is the Australian distributor and their sales have been extremely good in the last quarter. So we feel very confident about that number. So given the fact that wholesale sellout in December has been good, we feel okay about that number, but the fourth quarter of this year, we will not be able to replenish all of our sales in the United States because of our distribution issue. I want to be super clear about that.

Jon Mortimore executive
#34

And if you think back in terms of order book build, we've -- at the year-end last year, we shared with you the order book status for Autumn/Winter '22, and this is what we have been early June. And we think more collections, we are about 70% sold in than we did it again with expectation to be 100% by the end of September. We'll be able to share those same stats when we get round to the year-end. But at the moment, as Kenny has said, the order book is just starting to be built. So we can't talk much about it.

Richard Taylor analyst
#35

Understood. And then just moving on from sort of the inventory comments playing into your net debt estimates. I don't -- is there's anything given the statement on that debt, but perhaps you can refer to a consensus range on net debt and what you're comfortable with that, please?

Jon Mortimore executive
#36

I have not looked at the net debt number at this moment in time. However, from a net debt cash point of view, I have got no concerns. But can I get back to you on that point, please.

Operator operator
#37

Our next question today is from the line of Kate Calvert of Investec.

Kate Calvert analyst
#38

Two questions from me. Will the issues in the U.S. DC impact upon your new store plans in FY '24? And my second question is just on Asia. Do you think it will return to growth in FY '24?

Kenneth Wilson executive
#39

So I think on the first one on -- will the distribution center issues impact the -- their opening plan. We plan to go ahead with a similar number of stores next year in America, Kate, that we've done this year. So I think we'll end up the year at about 15. I might be wrong by one either way. And our plan on a similar number of stores in the United States next year. And as we've said before, we're very happy with the overall performance of stores we're opening in North America. So as a strategic lever, we feel good about that. We currently, at the moment, the LA DC which ships all product codes to our direct-to-consumer business and our existing New Jersey DC ships a collection of product codes, 2 stores on the East Coast. So we already shipped direct to consumer in the United States from 2 DCs. And as I said earlier, we already had a plan in place. It was part of our strategic plan that we were broadening out the capability of that New Jersey DC. First of all, we were going to expand the full direct-to-consumer range in that New Jersey DC. That was already an action, was in progress. As I've said today, for wholesale, we're going to further expand that. Some the long-winded way of saying direct-to-consumer shipments, either e-comm or stores, we put them first. So therefore, on the fact that we've got 2 DCs it won't impact it. So the store openings will move ahead. In terms of Asia Pacific, Jon can talk a bit more on the detail on this. I mean, what do I think we see, the Japan business, as we mentioned in the statement is performing well. Everything is going on plan to transfer over the 14 franchise stores in Japan owned and operated, and that will happen as we said, before the end of the financial year. So we feel very good about the business in Japan. China right now with the removal of zero-COVID, it's a small business for us. A high percentage of our employees in China have COVID, which probably means most people in China have COVID. You would assume the situation will get better in China as the year goes on. And then we also feel cautiously optimistic about the business in Korea. And as I mentioned, the Australian business, which is run through a distributor, which is one of our biggest businesses in Asia is also doing well. So that was a long-winded way of saying I think we feel pretty good about Asia for next year.

Jon Mortimore executive
#40

Yes, just to build -- essentially Asia growth next year will be driven by Japan, return on investments in Japan. I think Japan is old school, mainly physical retail country. We've got a small website along with the -- same as lots of other companies, but I think old school retail. Footfall in Japan is still about 25% below pre-pandemic levels. So there's opportunity for footfall growth. And we've got the annualization of the 14 stores that we're taking back, and I think we've opened 4 or 5 stores in Japan this year as well. So there's a big annualization benefit in Japan as well as still got some good headway on for full recovery. So we feel confident that Japan will drive the returns we get from Asia Pacific next year.

Operator operator
#41

[Operator Instructions] And it appears we are having no further questions registered. So I'd like to hand back to Kenny for any closing remarks.

Kenneth Wilson executive
#42

Okay. Thank you very much. As we said, we've accelerated this call today because of the reduction in our forecast. I just want to emphasize how disappointed we are about that. And the fact that some of this should have been within our control, we're not pleased about that, and we will be putting the fixes in place to make sure that we move this forward. I just want to thank everyone for joining this call because, obviously, we've had to call it a short notice. So thank you. And obviously, we'll be available in the days ahead for follow-up questions. Thank you very much, indeed.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Dr. Martens plc transcript - plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments and full-text search - through the EarningsAPI REST API or hosted MCP server.

Get an API key View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Dr. Martens plc earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsAPI REST API and the hosted MCP server. Quarterly plans from $105 - full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.