Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
November 10, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Michael Carrier
analystGood morning, everyone, and welcome back to the BofA Future of Financials Virtual Conference. I'm Mike Carrier, the research analyst at BofA covering the brokers, asset managers and exchanges. I hope you're all doing well. Our next company up is Apollo Management. And with us today is Josh Harris, Co-Founder. Josh and the team had built Apollo into the leading alternative asset manager and the largest alternative credit manager in the world. Josh runs the day-to-day operations, and he's been responsible for some of the most successful private equity investments at Apollo. So Josh, thanks for being with us today. And before I kick it off, I just want to let the audience know that if you have a question that you would like to ask, just submit it to the portal. And then towards the end, I'll be able to ask those questions as well.
Michael Carrier
analystAnd so Josh, just given your kind of unique perspective across markets and economies, I wanted to first start with a bigger-picture question. So there's been fairly significant divergence from what we're seeing in the public markets and the real economy. Do you think that divergence makes sense, particularly if we're getting closer to a vaccine? Or should there be reasons for concern?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So first of all, Mike, it's a pleasure to see you virtually. And a pleasure to be here. Thank you for having us. So technicals definitely are driving well ahead of fundamentals. And it actually does make sense when you think about -- if you think about the economy, right, we lost 22 million jobs, we've got 12 million back. Unemployment is still just under 7%. And the COVID-affected industries, even though, obviously, the very welcome news of a possible vaccine has broken, it's going to be a slow grind back as that gets rolled out and so forth and so on. And so you would expect that markets would be below where they are today. The market -- stock market is up 7%. The leverage finance markets have recovered. But what's happened is that the Federal Reserve has leaned in so much that rates are well below historical levels. And so when you look at -- even though you look at a P/E, we'll use the stock market as an example, it's about a 22, 23 P/E. When you -- that seems elevated. But when you look at that relative to 0 rates or 90 -- 70 to 90 basis point treasuries, it's not that elevated. In fact, what we do is we compare the earnings yield on the S&P 500, which is about 6 -- there's about a 6% spread between that and real rates today on the 10-year, and that's pretty average. It's a little bit above average. So even though you see technicals driving fundamentals and it looks like the markets are ahead of fundamentals than they are, unless the Fed and the Bank of China, Bank of Japan, the ECB, unless they change their policies, in the 0 rate environment, it actually makes a lot of sense. And so we're all going to have to deal with 0 rates and what we perceive to be overvaluation, I think, going forward for a while.
Michael Carrier
analystGreat. That's a good start and good macro color. Just on that front, like since you mentioned what the Fed has done and we've seen a lot of stimulus, whether it's been fiscal or monetary, and right now, we have low rates. But how do you think that eventually transitions, whether it's to inflation, a rate backdrop? And if we start to see more inflation going forward, how does Apollo, whether it's from an investment standpoint or from investors allocating money into alternatives, how do you think that plays out in that environment?
Joshua Harris
executiveSure. So first of all, I would say that, look, the Fed added $3 trillion to its balance sheet. That was as much as it added through the entire 10 years around the financial crisis of 2007, 2008, 2009. So you have seen an enormous move by the Fed, and there's -- and they've sort of signaled they're not going away. And so you would expect, right, with fiscal stimulus, with the Federal Reserve, with everything that's going on, you'd start to worry about inflation. But in actuality, there's a lot of slack in the economy. And what drives U.S. inflation and, to a lesser extent, global inflation is labor, generally. I mean there's some energy in there. There's some commodities. But by and large -- and as I mentioned, you still have 7% unemployment, which is roughly double where it was before we went into this. And you have continued -- even with all the trade war talk and other things, you still have globalization and countries where -- that are -- with very low-cost labor forces that are exporting goods into the U.S. And so I don't really believe that inflation is going to be much of an issue. I mean if it were an issue, then it would change everything. You would have a stagflation-type situation. But I feel like I don't believe that's going to happen. So I think we're in this -- the Fed has pretty much a freehand. It's got a dual mandate between unemployment and inflation. So it can continue to lean into lowering unemployment without much worry about inflation. You're still below the Fed's 2% inflation target. And as result, you're going to have 0 rates for a long time. And so what we're doing to combat that, right, is in a world that feels overvalued from a fundamental point of view is continuing to build out our private credit businesses. We're increasingly finding that we can generate a lot of excess return for our insurance company clients, our LP clients, 100, 200, 300, even 400 or 500 basis points of excess return all across the credit spectrum, whether it be a B credit, like we just did with Hertz, or whether it be a AA credit like we did with ADNOC. And so increasingly, our ability to originate private credit will be a huge advantage and something that we offer to our investors. We think there's a lot of tailwind there. I think also in private equity, we've got a two-pronged strategy. One is there is a bit of distress around. Obviously, these COVID-affected industries, and we can talk more about this, are going to have to go through some restructuring, and we're going to participate in that a bit. It's not broad-based. But we're seeing selected distressed opportunities. And even though the public markets are overvalued relative to fundamentals, as we discussed, we're seeing the bottom 25% of the public markets trading around a 10 P/E. So the markets no longer care about cash flow, right? I mean they care about growth, and that's what they're focused on. There used to be about 8,000 public companies. Now there's just over 4,000. There's 35,000 private companies. And so in many cases, the public markets aren't an appropriate home for even larger cash flow-oriented companies that might have -- might not be industry leaders or might have some complexity to their business. They might be in multiple business. They may not be in tech businesses. They may have some cyclicality. And so we see that as a good ground for doing deals. And we would expect our pipeline is building as is others, and we would expect to be announcing some stuff shortly.
Michael Carrier
analystAll right. Great. And then maybe shift over into the private equity business. How has the portfolio been like operating just in this COVID backdrop, whether it's areas that have been making some headwinds and tailwinds? And as you do get a vaccine, you come out of this, how do you see the outlook starting to shift?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So our private equity portfolio, I think as we've said before, we're a bit different than some of the other players out there. We created Fund VIII, our sort of last fund that's fully invested at about 6.5x multiple of EBITDA. And that's much lower than the industry standard, which was about 10x. And we had much less leverage on it. The average player had about 6x leverage as a multiple of EBITDA in their portfolio and we had 3.5x. And so we went into the crisis with less financial leverage. And we -- about -- while obviously, in a very small number of cases in energy and retail, we had, like everyone, a problem or 2. We generally have very few companies on what we call our watch list right now. It's less than 3%. And by and large, our companies are weathering the storm well. And so we're definitely shifting to playing offense. And so the fact that we started off the crisis with no -- with very few maturities, no covenants, lots of liquidity, low leverage, allowed us to weather through. And in terms of the performance of the companies, it's as you would expect, which is, on average, GDP is going to be down, depending on who you ask, 3% to 5% this year. And you'll see our companies' revenues trending down in line with GDP. And then -- but you're also seeing that rebound in the third quarter and going into the fourth quarter now. And so we're tracking basically what you would expect in the economy. And so in terms of the vaccine and the outlook, I think that things have clarified a bit, right, in terms of where we are. Like I think that you're going to see cases -- the election is over. The results, which looks to be sort of divided government, are -- that's a very good business climate. We think everything will be pulled to the middle. Some of the more radical things that were being discussed on either side, I think that's going to be harder to get done. And so business confidence is coming back. That part of the equation has sort of been somewhat clarified. And then in COVID, obviously, cases were ticking up. I think we're all girding for the next 6 to 9 months through the warmer weather to be more difficult. And -- but then therapeutics are coming along. And obviously, we had the big announcement on a vaccine. And so every expectation is that, in the second half of '21, that will start to become more widely available. And so as a result, you can start to look at some of these COVID-affected industries and start to try to put base cases, business cases around them as to the slow recovery of those industries. And there is leverage availability out there. And so you're seeing everyone's pipeline building. You are seeing, both in terms of private credit and deal flow, a return to more normalized levels. We would expect to return to more normal -- after levels going -- private equity transactions and credit transactions being down 1/3 to 50%, depending on the area for the first part of the year. Now you're seeing -- I would expect in the fourth quarter, first quarter, you'll start to see people do deals where, ourselves included, where they can handicap the return of these industries in a positive way. And the fact that there's this clarifying base case before Christmas, before the shopping season, particularly as cases were spiking and you had this political uncertainty, that was kind of putting a chill on everything. Now there is this clarification. So obviously, the world is unpredictable. Something could happen to change it all. But I see -- I think people are going to lean in now to a more optimistic approach to getting transactions done.
Michael Carrier
analystThat's helpful. And then maybe one other question on the private equity side. Technology, if we look across a lot of industries, it had some impact. And in some areas, it's created some value traps and other companies have been able to reposition and move on. So how has Apollo adapted to some of these technology changes and kind of incorporating that knowledge and that skill when either making investments or working with the companies in the portfolio?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So we're doing a lot of things. I mean, obviously, technology is a massive and growing part of the economy. And so we're all-in in terms of both origination. So the definition of -- Apollo, what we're really good at is creating proprietary origination at arbitrages at discounted prices, whether it be distressed for control, where we're absorbing a process complexity, or whether it be corporate carve-outs, where we're absorbing complexity of carving out a business. But certainly, in a lot of cases, technology businesses are trapped in significant other portfolios. They may not be valued appropriately. We're good at recognizing value where others don't. And so the definition of an Apollo technology investment is one where we're able to create it at a discount to what we think is fair value because some either misunderstanding of a business or some complexity that we have to manage, either process-oriented or in terms of managing. And so whether it be the Rackspace deal that we accomplished, taking West private, there are plenty of examples of Apollo investing in private equity technology transactions. And that's going to be a continuing growth part of our business. In the credit side, we're finding increasingly that, whether it be Airbnb or Expedia or many other companies, that there is an appropriate part of a technology company's capital structure, which is credit or debt. And our ability to move quickly in size and understand these companies has allowed us to -- in the case of the March to June time frame, to get them over the hump completely-wise or, in many cases, kind of help them grow their companies. And so we're also seeing significant possibilities and growth in our origination capability around private credit. And then lastly, we're bringing -- we have [ AC ], Apollo Consulting, and we have a whole force here, a whole group of people that is enabling our companies with technology, led by fellow, Aaron Miller, that we're happy to have. And whether it be -- I mean, the most, whether it be enabling cloud and Internet-based kind of back office or marketing applications or sales applications, like we're bringing technology across our platform. And it's creating a massive amount of opportunity and EBITDA. And so all of that -- and as well as facilitating some of our portfolio companies, like ADT just announced a partnership with Google. So there are plenty of our companies that are also availing themselves of new technology in a way that is very positive for them. And so technology is big, it's important and it's growing and we're all in.
Michael Carrier
analystGreat. And then just you mentioned on the deployment, some opportunities picking up and pipelines filling up as well. Despite the progress on vaccines, it seems like this environment is probably going to last longer than most people maybe expected or hoped, and that creates some challenges with private companies. So when you look at those opportunities that are starting to emerge and you're able to look out a couple of years and see how it plays out, what are some of the more attractive areas that you guys are spending time on?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So first of all, I mean, obviously, in summer, the COVID-affected industries, these companies are going to emerge with just too much debt. So whether it be travel or travel-related services or events, it's been public that we're helping with the restructuring of Swissport's debt as an example, that's been out there, certainly Hertz. And there's going to be a lot of examples of us just working with great companies that found themselves with lower EBITDA and probably needing to rightsize their capital structures. And that could be done either through restructurings as the ones I've talked about or more towards capital solutions, getting people over the hump. And so that would be the first thing. I think, secondly, in some of the COVID-affected industries and in private equity, you can now invest -- there's -- you can -- because of the availability of leverage and low-cost leverage, right, we're looking at deals where, okay, even if it's '24, '25, right, in terms of revenues and EBITDA, as long as you get back to that '19 level by '24, '25, you're okay. And so you can give yourself some room, you can give yourself some cushion. You have to set up the capital structure in a nuanced and intricate way. And so -- to make sure that you have the room and if things go wrong and you could see it's all very unpredictable. But if you set it up right, you've got ample room to create real private equity returns. And then lastly, we're now a lender to the middle market and we're seeing the middle market private equity groups come alive. And so we're seeing sort of needing to lend to them in terms of sort of stretched senior secured debt through our MidCap platform and in Europe. And so that would be another area. And then lastly, it's just this origination. We've done this year-to-date, so far, $13 billion of transactions between -- that is like off the run, where it's everything from Albertsons to Cimpress to Expedia to now Hertz, $13 billion. And we calculate that ADNOC, which was a AA oil company that we did a sale-leaseback with, and we're finding that some of the Federal Reserve money doesn't reach into some of these areas. And so they're just too complicated for the markets or what have you. And so we've generated those opportunities at what we think is a 300 basis point spread for our clients and also help these companies get through either raise growth capital, in the case of ADNOC, or get over the hump or do some pre-IPO financing as we did in Albertsons. And so there are tremendous win-wins between private companies or public companies that need private capital and our investors, which are pension funds, teachers, firefighters, government workers that need money for their retirement. I mean one of the effects of 0 rates, right, obviously, is that the pension system needs to generate 6%, 7%, 8% returns to keep up with funding for health care costs and the promises that they have made. And so we're helping with that.
Michael Carrier
analystAll right. It's good color on the investment side. And then Apollo tends to be a bit more dynamic in terms of the types of investments that you make, depending on where we are in the cycle and this investment backdrop. I know you guys have mentioned in Fund IX focusing more on distressed opportunities versus like traditional private equity. What are some of the pros and cons when you kind of shift to those types of investments versus, say, the more traditional private equity-style investments that investors should know?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So distressed historically has been about 25% to 30% of our business. But it's varied in our private equity funds and it's varied from the vintage financial crisis fund, which was about 60% to Fund VIII, right, which was 2013, that's about 5%. And it's really all about buying good companies with bad balance sheets, right? So there are times where you want to do that. And there are times where what's distressed is sort of not such a good company and so you want to avoid it. And so it's been a cyclical business. As far as the value proposition of it, it's been an incredible business for us. So the average returns in our distressed business have been about 1,000 basis points higher than our private equity business. And the reality is that we've gotten in at a slightly lower multiple. But generally, it's when EBITDA is depressed, right? It's during a recession or otherwise. And we've been able to work through a distressed reorganization process and really create value. And then many of the companies that we've acquired, whether it be Lyondell or Charter cable being some of the biggest, have -- as I mentioned, Swissport would be one in Fund IX. That's public. Those companies then, we've been able to bring in new management and sort of go from buying them well and buying them at a trough to really managing them quite well and creating real value. And so distressed business, I think we've only lost money 2 or 3 times in our history. It's been a great business. Because of the Fed action, the sort of left -- the significant -- the distressed sort of opportunity is more selective this time whereas in the financial crisis, it was -- and in '01 and 1990, which were the other time periods, it was longer, very broad-based, had many, many companies that couldn't access the markets. The Federal Reserve deployed a massive amount of firepower into the system. And so the markets really were very open for many, many companies. And so -- but having said that, the markets can be as open as you want. But unless you -- if you have too much debt, that's not really going to help you. Eventually, you're going to have to restructure. And so there are going to be selective opportunities today. As of now, we've invested about $2 billion of Fund IX's money. So that's probably -- we have a $25 billion fund. That's 8% or 9% of the fund. We're about 40% invested, so maybe it's about 20-ish percent of that part of the fund. And there are a number of situations that we're working on right now, where we own the debt of companies. And -- but it will be -- my guess is it will end up being, unless there's some new event, 15% of that fund. And we'll have to deploy other strategies. But by and large, it's a very good business. And -- but in this particular situation, it won't be that much of our fund is my estimate, although you can never predict. And what you have to do is you have to be ready to shift the dial and allow -- whatever the environment gives you. If there's some other thing that happens that more and more financial players in the market are very astute and you have to be -- we have thousands of names that we track. We're very integrated with our credit business. We don't restrict the -- we're one firm so we have no so-called information walls. Everyone is restricted -- or not restricted. And so we're set up very different than other firms. And so when there is an opportunity, we take advantage of it. But the opportunity will likely be limited in this case to the COVID-affected industries. And there'll be a bunch of stuff to do both across credit and private equity.
Michael Carrier
analystOkay. That makes sense. Then maybe just shifting over to the credit part of the business. There's been some concern just given the strong growth and the low rates and the interest in yield that maybe there's been too much growth in private credit. You guys are a leading player in that business. You've had a long history in credit so you kind of know the risks to some of the structural growth. So just wanted to get your perspective, when you look at the outlook in this low rate environment, how do you see that playing out in terms of some of the concerns that people have versus the structural demand by your clients that are looking for those opportunities?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. I think it's -- we have a long runway here, and I understand people's perspective. But if you think about it, when you add up the entire banking system, and this is a little trite, but you're over $100 trillion. And we're the largest private credit player out there, and we're kind of between $200 billion and $300 billion. And when you add up all of the public companies, which -- and even some of the private ones that you know, it's hard to get to $1 trillion. And so it's just a relative size. And today, the -- increasingly, like the regulatory framework and the capital requirements of the banking system aren't necessarily -- increasingly, banks are moving out of this area. They're -- they don't want to hold risk. And as a result, increasingly, they're being disintermediated in this area. And people or firms like Apollo and some of our clients and some of the sovereign wealth funds and insurance companies are increasingly playing in this market. And they're the ones holding the risk. And so they're just going more direct. And so there's going to be a lot more growth in this area. And if you think about the public markets, right, where the pension system may have -- depending on which pension fund you're talking about, but you may have 30%, 40%, even 50% of your assets in the public credit markets. And you're going to have a whole bunch more in the equity markets. And the equity markets, even though they've been buoyed by technology and quantitative easing, increasingly smart players are saying, "Wow, what is my prediction for equity market returns, 5%, 6%?" So the ability to have downside protection and a safe 6% to 10% return in the private credit markets is very, very attractive for our pension plan clients. And so the supply of investor dollars is there. And what we're working very hard on is creating origination platforms to source private opportunities. And so every day, we wake up. So we're at an imbalance, where we have between our insurance company clients, Athene and Athora, and our LPs, there's so much demand for credit and so much demand for this excess return that we actually can't take all the money that's being offered to us today. And so we deployed, for example, between -- we started a new deployment metric. But we talked about $60 billion to $70 billion over the last 9 months as we redeployed some of our insurance company balance sheets and our LP clients' money. And so increasingly, we do expect that private credit will continue to grow. There's a long runway. Some of the expectations of defaults, people were talking about 10%, haven't really materialized as a result of the Fed action and as a result of the COVID sort of V, which we've talked about. And so we're continuing to see the demand for this private credit. And for us, it's all about origination. And as I said, we've done about $13 billion of it this year across, call it, 10 transactions and evolved in it. Some of them are in the paper. And we're going to -- that's just sort of high-profile ones. And then underneath the surface, we have everything from sale-leasebacks to aircraft financing to consumer student loan credit to any number of opportunities that we have going on. And so -- infrastructure lending. And so we're going to keep building up those origination platforms to satisfy that client demand. And I do think that it has a long runway. And I think you'll see excess return for a long period of time.
Michael Carrier
analystGreat. That's good color on credit. And then maybe just -- I know it's very early. But based on some of the clarity that we've got around the election and some of Biden's policies around taxes and regulation, is anything out there that you see that would either create concerns or potential opportunities for Apollo or the alternative industry on a broader perspective?
Joshua Harris
executiveLook, I think that as -- we set up our platform to be very broad and to be able to take advantage of whatever political climate exists at that time. And clearly, the election of the Biden administration plus the very narrow margins in both the House and the Senate are going to moderate, we're predicting like a pretty moderate approach to regulation, to tax policy. I do think you could see -- you're going to see a push on infrastructure. Whether that gets done in the Senate and Congress is unclear. But you'll see some spending. And I think you'll see a smaller fiscal deal. I don't think it's going to be the big one. I think it will be a more moderate $1 trillion to $2 trillion deal. That would be our prediction. But we're not politicians. And so by and large, you're going to see a moderate Washington. And that's going to create consumer confidence, business confidence. And so it will be a pretty good environment. And then you'll see very low rates. And so when you think about all that -- and then you'll see a slow return of the COVID industries. So when you think about all that, it's sort of going to be a pretty good private equity environment. It will be a pretty good lending environment if you can originate things off the run. The public markets will continue to be kind of high on a fundamental basis, driven by technicals and a Fed that's leaning in. And so it's sort of a continuation of what we've seen in our strategy is what we're predicting. And now we don't see any like major sort of regulatory shifts that are going to be. But they're going to be industry-by-industry and company-by-company. And obviously, we'll be underwriting them.
Michael Carrier
analystOkay, makes sense. And I just wanted to touch on, just given the recent headlines around Leon's personal business relationships with Epstein, how this has been impacting, whether it's client relationships and the growth outlook. And you guys have mentioned the Conflict Committee to review the information and clear out absolutely the LPs have, the information that they need to kind of move forward. So just wanted an update on whether it's the timing of that process and how clients have been interacting with Apollo.
Joshua Harris
executiveSure. So Apollo never did any business with Jeffrey Epstein. And we have a very broad-based team here, right? It's not -- going back to 1990, Leon, Marc and I and 9 other people were in one room in L.A., one room in New York. But now the firm has moved on. It's 1,500 people. We have a very, very deep bench, led by Scott Kleinman, Jim Zelter, Martin Kelly, Anthony Civale. We have 15 people on our Management Committee that meets every week to manage the firm. And we have 60 people on our leadership advisory forum. And there's a small number of us that are sort of managing this part of it. But like, by and large, everyone is working and investing capital for our clients and creating great investments and talking to our clients. In terms of the review itself, that's being handled by the Conflicts Committee and their counsel, which -- and what we've been told is that they expect to complete it by the end of the year. And certainly, our clients and all of us are -- Leon asked for this review. And we're excited to bring transparency and a bright light to all of these issues, even though our firm really doesn't -- didn't have anything to do with it. And so while that process is going on for the next 4 to 8 weeks, there will definitely be LPs that put us on pause, wait for that review. What we said on our -- and the counsel said that it's going to be thorough. And Leon said he's going to fully cooperate. And so -- but we would not -- we would expect that the firm will continue to grow through all that. What we said on our conference call was that even in the unlikely event that all of our LPs put us on hold, and we don't expect that, but we're just trying to bookend it for people so they understand. Based on the $100 billion increase in AUM we had year-to-date, a normalized level of investing and a normalized level of transaction fees and growth in our insurance platforms, we would expect that we would grow revenues 7% to 9%. And so we don't expect that, but we wanted to bookend it for people. We grew $100 billion, as I said, last year. And over 80% of that of $80 billion-plus was these insurance platforms. And we have between $40 billion and $50 billion of dry powder. And there have been no redemptions. 97% of our capital is either private equity or permanent, so long-dated. But even that 3%, there have been no out-of-ordinary court redemptions. And so next 4 to 6 weeks, we're all going to be waiting to hear what's going on. But the firm continues to have momentum going forward.
Michael Carrier
analystGreat. We just have a question coming in. And this is on the insurance side. You guys have been very active, both in terms of working with the team on different transactions on the inorganic side but also growing the business in terms of the organic. So just given the rate backdrop and demographics and retirement needs, how do you see the organic playing out? And then on the inorganic, just given that -- assuming alternative managers are focused on the space, how do you try to differentiate?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. Great. So obviously, we have 150 -- and I'll start with the second part first. We have 150 investors here that are focused on financial services. And clearly, we've raised a huge amount of equity capital insurance. We -- $18 billion or so since the start of Athene. And we have a lot of firepower. We have more than $80 billion of firepower to go do transactions without any new capital. And clearly, we did a number of transactions, VIVAT in Europe and Jackson in the U.S. And so we would -- and we would expect that even though our competitors are getting into the business, just the size and breadth of our platform, our understanding of various insurance markets, it doesn't usually come in a neat box. Like you need lots of capabilities to underwrite liabilities. And then importantly, our asset management capability. So one of the things that makes all this work is that we've been able to generate -- and Athene said this on their earnings call, Athene Asset Management, which is part of Apollo, 40 basis point net of -- 40 basis points of excess return net of fees over time for Athene's assets. So that's -- insurance is about -- that's about 500 basis points of ROE. So if you look at Athene's ROE, it's about 15% or so. And that would compare to its competitors that are in mid-single digit to high single digit. And so it's that asset management capability, which isn't easy to duplicate, and the origination capability, which really comes in handy, in addition to being able to generate these kind of bespoke M&A nonorganic opportunities. So in the financial world, it always comes -- people copy you, but you've got to stay ahead. You've got to innovate. And I think we're well ahead in insurance, I would expect. And just the size of our platform, our ability to do big deals and our ability to work through very complicated situations, both on the liability and the asset side, is going to carry us forward in a very positive way. And the low rates that we've been talking about the whole conversation, that really puts a lot of pressure. And we -- I believe that we think we now are, on an organic basis, turning to that, maybe in the last quarter or so the most prolific organic underwriter. So we would expect what Athene does is they look at where are the best returns they can generate. And they say, "Okay, is it organic? Is it inorganic?" And they have a system now that can generate organic liability growth. And there's a lot of people that are exiting the fixed annuity business. They don't have the asset management capability. They're in other businesses. And so increasingly, we're seeing that Athene is either #1 or #2 in organic growth, and that's going to be a function of where they see the best opportunities. There's many ways to create attractive liabilities. And so what we've seen is that even with the low rates, Athene and a possibility to generate these excess returns at the same level of risk is allowing for them to grow through this both organically and inorganically. And we would expect that to continue.
Michael Carrier
analystAll right. Great. Looks like we're out of time here, but -- so we'll stop there. But Josh, I want to thank you for spending the time with us today, really appreciate it. And hopefully, next year we'll be back in person.
Joshua Harris
executiveIt'd be great to see you and everyone in person. The Zoom thing is getting old. But thank you for having us, and look forward to being -- next summer when we can hopefully be in -- live.
Michael Carrier
analystSounds good. Thanks a lot.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Apollo Global Management, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Apollo Global Management, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.